Choosing whether you are left or right or centre has become integral to the identity of someone who likes to call themselves “politically woke”. Infact, it won’t be a surprise if in a few years we have an instagram feature allowing us to specify our political side in our bios. I say this because I believe it has become so important to support a side in the political world that it has almost turned into a toxic pressurized environment.
Supporting one of the two wings isn’t the problem, the issue is the apparent loyalty to that side one is expected to show on public and social media platforms. This is quite visible in the recent social media “trend” of thinking of left sided youth as cool whereas the right sided one as narrow minded. The choice of words in calling the left as liberal and the right as conservative is a whole another debate but closely linked to the present argument. Both the left and the right sides feel a constant pressure to not blend an inch into the other side because that will supposedly make their arguments non-static or uninformed.
However, I firmly believe that politics is not that simple to understand or indulge in. What we have started to present on social media regarding politics is as superficial as the way we present our lives on social media. Nothing is perfect in real life and there is absolutely no acknowledgement of the grey area. Any political argument shouldnt be seen as something either left or right but as something which can have valid points from both the sides.
Another distressing habit I see in people around me in schools and universities is isolation towards someone not conforming to their side of the story. Friends are made not on values like kindness, loyalty or honesty but on the religious and political affirmations of a person. This leads to the flourishing of a youth which is ideologically stagnant and non-accommodative.
At times, it is considered that a person is ‘uninformed’ or ‘incapable of taking a stand’ if they agree to the political stances of others in supposed discussions. However, I believe that this trait is a sign of flexibility and acceptance which is undoubtedly better than being firm in your opinion to the point it becomes an inseparable value irrespective of whether it is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’.
Conclusively, I feel the current discussions around politics in the ‘intellectual’ circles in India and even abroad is becoming increasingly toxic and inconclusive which heightens the need to palliate our toxic obsession with considering political affiliations while judging people. Probably this is impossible to achieve but I like to believe that at least an effort to move into that direction will bring a huge change.